Explain ‘Natural Moral Law’ Essay

raw(a) honor can be traced bet on into the Ancient Greek and Roman worlds. In Sophocles play Antigone, inherent Law is very app atomic number 18nt throughout and the writings of the Greek Philosopher Aristotle. In his works Nicomachean Ethics he wroteThe natural is that which is everywhere, is equally valid, and depends not upon organism or not being receivedthat which is natural is unchangeable, and has the same power everywhere.The Ancient Stoics emphasised the sizeableness of Logos, or rationality, that governs the world and sees human nature as one natural order. They considered natural right as a law of right reason. In his letter to the Romans, St Paul wrote about a law that is written in the hearts of Gentiles. It is on that pointfore clear that throughout the ancient world, although there is differing terminology, there seems to amaze been a consensus over the existence of a natural virtuous law, which dictated the rightness or incorrectness of an action that was not dependent upon the laws created by society.St. Thomas Aquinas developed a fuller bank bill of this natural law in the thirteenth century. This theory is both deontological and absolutist and so his resulting work is think upon the ethicacy of actions. In his work Summa Theologica, Aquinas described natural law as a moral code, which exists deep down the purpose of nature and was created by God. He says that it is present in every human being. Natural Law exists to aid humans, directing their actions in such a counseling that they might meet their eternal destiny. He argued that there was a basic law, from which all the other natural laws derived. This was to pursue good and avoid evil.For Aquinas, both the tendency and the act are important, this is because his theory is based on a mainly deontological view. The only end that he values is God as He is intrinsically good. He believed that acts are intrinsically good or bad because when human beings act in accordance with thei r ultimate purpose, God is glorified. Aquinas followed the line of position that human beings are intelligent and therefore should be able to direct him or her egotism, this therefore gist that they can take responsibility for knowing and doingwhat God intends for them.Whether or not an act leads towards God depends on whether it fits the purpose that humans were made for. For Thomas Aquinas, the main purpose of human life is to preserve the self and the innocent, to reproduce, worship God, acquire knowledge and live in ordered society.. He names these the primary precepts acts that are in accordance with these precepts are good and those, which do not, are bad. He also names them the subsidiary precepts which are rulings about things that we should or should not do because they uphold a primary precept.The theory of Natural Law as put forward by Aquinas, is based upon the religious view that God created the world, establishing in it a sense of order and purpose, which is a dir ect representation of His will. In the natural law draw near to ethics, the action itself can either be natural or unnatural, and is judged on that basis. It does not depend for its moral law justification upon any results. Therefore, according to natural law, an action can be deemed good in itself, even if it brings about suffering.In conclusion, Natural Moral Law enables to establish rules in order to anatomical structure a community. It gives a concrete reason to be moral and a firm basis from which to turn away to step over moral boundaries. It provides justification and support for certain core ideas and it judges actions, irrespective of consequences. Natural Moral Law isnt just simply a set of rules, but a way of living. It gives guidance on everyday questions on how to live and links them to the fundamental principles of life. It provides a complete clay of moral living in step with what it is to be human.